23. With One SpiritThe issue at hand
in this chapter is whether or not 1 Corinthians 12:13 is directly comparable
to the contrast between John’s water and Messiah’s Holy Spirit found six
times in Scripture. If comparable then all disciples should experience a
similar reception of the Holy Spirit from Messiah as the 120 on Shavu’ot.
Moreover, if comparable, our view of baptism and being baptized in all of
Paul’s letters would be strongly influenced, since it would often mean a
discernible spiritual experience which has nothing to do with water.
Different beliefs hinge mostly on the interpretation of the Greek preposition
en. “For ‘en’
one Spirit we all into one body were baptized.” As we have seen, en
generally means in, indicating relative position, but it was such a flexible
word that it is impossible to assign it a single meaning. It often was used
with the understanding of instrumentality (with, or by). The question of the
meaning of this verse usually boils down to three basic choices of meaning
for en which change the meaning of the sentence somewhat. One view is
positional and the other two are instrumental. 1.
In
one Spirit we were baptized into one body. A disciple is surrounded by the
Spirit in order to become a part of the body of Messiah. Though mode is what
is thought important (surrounded, immersed) the implication is that of
changed nature. 2.
By
one Spirit we were baptized into one body. Here the Spirit is thought to act
on His own prerogative to baptize, or join, a disciple to Messiah’s body. 3.
With
(or, by means of) one Spirit we were baptized into one body. Someone else
(Messiah) acts to baptize using the Spirit as an Element which has power to
radically change the nature of the disciple, causing them to share in His
realm of influence, His body. This book takes the
third understanding as the correct one. This means Paul’s comment is similar
to R. John’s, Yeshua’s and Peter’s contrast between water and Spirit.
Comments about the three views follow. The first example
of being surrounded by the Spirit means little unless He also changes the
nature of the person, and if transformation of nature by the Spirit is the
important aspect of this verse then the other two meanings are equally
plausible. The second choice
is something which in a very narrow view of the process of salvation is true,
the Spirit Himself does radically change the nature of a person to conform to
the glorious nature of Messiah. However, in the overall context of the
Corinthian passage the Spirit is directly associated with God and Messiah and
does not operating independently, but is sent by God through Messiah to
change the nature of the disciple, joining him to the Body. The Holy Spirit
cannot bring a person into the body of Messiah apart from that person calling
on the name of Yeshua, knowing Him as the resurrected Lord. Yeshua is the
Person into whom faith is exerted to initiate the process of salvation, not
the Spirit. It therefore seems difficult to conclude that Paul was writing
that the Spirit acts to baptize of His own prerogative. Evidently some who
hold this point of view, that en means “by,” do not believe Messiah
has baptized His disciples with the Holy Spirit since the event of Shavu’ot,
see The Baptism, Filling, and Gifts of the Holy Spirit, by W.A.
Criswell. Messiah supposedly baptized His body once, and since then the Holy
Spirit is fully present on earth to everyone who believes Yeshua is the
Messiah. Since Shavu’ot the Spirit is supposed to do the baptizing,
not Messiah. This view also
disconnects 1 Corinthians 12:13 from any discernible charismatic experience
since being baptized “by” the Spirit in Corinthians has no association with
the discernible event of Messiah baptizing with His Spirit in the other
“pentecostal” passages.9 Supposedly the two are not equivalents,
being baptized by the Spirit is exclusively the process which leads a person
to believe Yeshua is Messiah. In this teaching a person “has” the Spirit at
the point of belief that Yeshua is Messiah and Savior, the supposed reception
is believed to occur without knowledge of a discernible influence except the
recognition that Yeshua is the Messiah, at that point the disciple supposedly
received the Spirit. This means all Christians in Christianity received the
Spirit even if they have not had a supernatural experience of receiving the
Spirit. Such a Christian may in fact deny or repudiate experiences by others. This doctrine sets
the stage for the “second blessing” of many charismatic teachers. Since all
Christians “have” the Spirit they later need a tremendous release through the
baptism with the Spirit (or also commonly called, incorrectly, the baptism
“of” the Spirit), the noble goal being a release of power into the life of
defeated disciples. Sometimes people are simply told to begin to speak by
faith whatever comes to their mouth, whether or not they ever had an
experience of receiving the Spirit. No doubt many have been blest to be
filled with the Spirit through such incomplete instruction. On the other
hand, others have no experience with God, do not cry out “Abba, Papa!” by the
leading of the Spirit, but wind up stuttering two or three syllables with no
other experience, and this “tongue” is supposed to be a “heavenly prayer
language.” The uttering of syllables is the baptism, not a transforming,
unforgettable supernatural experience, and the forced syllables are said to
be prayer for personal edification. Books like, The
Charismatics, by John MacArthur, dispute charismatic experiences in
general and the second blessing viewpoint in particular by saying that en
in 1 Corinthians 12:13 means this verse is directly comparable to the
experience of Acts 1:5-2:1-4. In other words, all Christians not only have
the Spirit, but if they believed Yeshua is Messiah they received the Spirit
in a way comparable to the first disciples on Shavu’ot. Modern
charismatic experiences however, are to be shunned or repudiated, cf. Joseph
Dillow, Speaking in Tongues. We have already
seen however, that immediately after Messiah poured out the Spirit on the
hundred and twenty, the three thousand new believers did not have the Spirit
dwelling in them though they would soon receive the Spirit, “for to you is
the promise.” The Spirit was assuredly testifying to them, so forcefully they
were “cut” in their hearts, deeply stricken over sin, and it was the
conviction of the Spirit that enabled the three thousand to repent and turn
to Yeshua. But the ability to hear and listen, to be cut in heart, or even to
act on the voice of the Spirit did not mean a person had “received the
Spirit.” It was a crucial point in reconciliation to God, but not the final
point. The testimony of the Spirit led them to trust Messiah as the Lord and
Savior of Israel, but until they received the indwelling Spirit from Him they
were not spiritual members of Messiah’s body, according to 1 Corinthians
12:13. This makes it
difficult to believe “by” the Spirit is the correct translation, that the
Spirit of His own prerogative baptizes disciples into the body of Messiah.
The Spirit does testify in such a way as to lead a person to the Savior, but
Messiah Himself then acts to save the person with His Spirit, the riches of
His salvation. Messiah uses the
Holy Spirit as a powerful Element to baptize - inseparably unite - them all
into a new kind of existence, becoming members of His body. He has the
prerogative of sending His Spirit to transform His disciples, not the Spirit
Himself. God, through Messiah, baptizes with His Holy Spirit and the context
of 1 Corinthians 12 supports this view. On His own, the
Spirit is able to distribute various gifts according to His will, Paul outlines
the gifts of the Spirit as they are to operate within the body of Messiah,
12:8-11, and though there are many different gifts it is one and the same
Spirit operating in each gift. Then in “But now God
has set the members, each one of them, in the body just as He pleased.” and, “Now you are
the body of Messiah and members individually. And God has appointed these in
the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that
miracles, then gifts of healing, administrations, varieties of tongues.” Here members of the
body, and offices and gifts of the Spirit are established, not by the
Spirit’s sole prerogative, but by God the Father. Thus in God, through His
Messiah, poured out the Spirit on Cornelius and his house, the Spirit did not
pour Himself out. And just as the great prophet R. John purified the
repentant of Moreover, Paul
concluded 1 Corinthians 12:13 saying all members of the body had been given
one Spirit to drink. Who gives the Spirit to drink if not Messiah Himself? He
said, “If anyone thirsts let him come to me and drink.” Here Paul is making
the analogy of what he had written earlier concerning the nation of Israel in
1 Corinthians 10:4 where all Israel drank the same spiritual drink from the
rock which followed them, and the rock was Messiah. In the same way just as
ancient Endnotes 9Acts
1:5, 2:1-4; 10:44-46, |